Jump to content

Donald Trump


Zach Caldwell

Recommended Posts

​Many of you have probably already heard. Donald Trump as entered into the Presidential race on the Republican side. The left seems kind of giddy with his entry while the right seems split on his being in the race.

 

What do you think? Is he for real, or is this all just some major PR stunt for him? He has said he was thinking about or seriously considering running in past elections but never took the plunge. It seems he has now. But then again, he has 120 days to file his intent with the Election Commission, will he? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has absolutely less than .001 percent chance of winning and he knows it, even if he does finance his campaign with his own money. He is a shrewd business man and will not spend hundreds of millions or even billions on a lost cause.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let us be perfectly frank here: Even to Donald Trump, Trump's candidacy is a farce.

 

He likes to call names, play games, make up "simple and intelligent" solutions to complex problems and he thinks that full on dictators like Putin will take him seriously.  He is little more than a very smart carnival barker with some experience in the real estate game.  His understanding of government only extends to what he "thinks" the executive branch of the United States government is.  He has no idea of the political acumen required to get even a simple, common sense, imminently necessary bill through congress, even with a congress made up of allies instead of ideological opponents.

 

Let us remember what is on this man's resume for the temp job he hasn't even filled out the necessary applications for, as of this posting.  He has a very popular reality television show where the premise is he gets to fire people.  So he is basically already killing jobs, professionally.  He has raised buildings using other peoples money and puts his name on them.  Which is akin to either plagiarism or stealing a scientific paper.  He's filed for bankruptcy several times,  yet he tells the world that he is worth over $9 billion US Dollars.  He complains that other politicians can't fill a room, yet he hired actors and basically bribed people off the street with T-shirts to get people into his announcement speech.

 

This man actually was a paid performer for the WWE.  Allegations have come out, that I am still seeking verification of, that he dodged the draft.  This man changes political parties like some people change socks.  In the last presidential election, He first opposed, then backed Mitt Romney, and after the election was lost, he threw Mitt Romney under the bus.  This is not the team player or even team leader the Republican party needs.

 

People who know me, know I am a centrist with some liberal leanings and some conservative leanings.  I think it is good for the country as a whole when both parties, while keeping their unique identities, work together.  Believe it or not, both sides want change and have their own ideas about what changes are needed.  There has been resistance to opposing views with such vehemence of late that it almost seems reactionary.  Which saddens me.  However, I think even my Republican/Conservative friends can agree that this "candidate" is only out for himself.  He has always been talk and bluster, lacking substance of any sort or any idea of what actual policy might be.  He has put his name in for political office before only to withdraw when he has to debate with actual politicians, who will chew him up and spit him out like a little school boy caught cheating on a quiz. 

 

Brass is not gold, Mr. Trump.  Your record shows you are full of hot air, cheap shine on cheaper product, and that you change your positions on the whim of what you think people want to hear.  Beating up Rosy O'Donnel in the media doesn't mean you've won an intellectual championship.  A man of your supposed intelligence should know that you don't eat New York Pizza in the open with a fork, and never with Sarah Palin (Its the green eggs and ham rule, you should know better).  And honestly, whom do you believe you are fooling with that billion dollar comb over hyper weird brain covering oddity you refer to as a hairstyle? 

 

He's as phony a candidate as he is at everything else he does.  How he manages to keep billions of dollars, a sense of self respect, the respect of anyone he's not paying, for that matter, is completely beyond me.  Part of me wants him to stay in the race and have the other Republicans cut him to shreds so he will finally go away.  Part of me wants him to stay in it so he can waste millions of his own fortune, only to realize he's way out of his league.  Part of me wants his candidacy to be a short cut for someone else in the Republican nomination pack to emerge as a clear, logical, thoughtful, intelligent, persuasive, capable leader who can make the party no longer the joke it's become of late.

 

Yeah, part of me wants to see all that.  But the more sane and sensible part of me just wants this buffoon to go away.  You stain the process, sir, with your idiocy and flash.  You cheapen the office you claim to run for, and the other candidates, by not being serious and simply looking for attention.  In short, Mr. Trump, please desist.  You haven't got it in you, and with any common sense at all, the whole country will realize it.  You can't tell Putin "you're fired" and expect him to take you seriously.  You can't claim China is stealing all our jobs when your clothing line is produced there.  You can't claim the American Dream is dead (with respect to the recent loss of Dusty Rhodes) while you're living high on the hog.  You can't expect to lead Americans when you consider them so far beneath you.  Even Darryl Issa knows that wont fly.

 

Thoughts, anyone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had to laugh yesterday when scrolling through my Facebook timeline when I came across a post from an old friend that I went to school with.  The gist of her post was that she was an adamant supporter of "The Donald" and if she got messages from ANYONE who badmouthed him, she would immediately unfriend them "...no second chances!"  I've encountered similar warnings from other freinds and family members over the last month or so as other "esteemed statesmen" have entered the race for the Republican presidential nomination.  Honestly, sometimes I wonder if maybe I was born in some alternate universe, like I read about in many of the stories here, and then thrust into this one!  I can't believe that we had much the same experiences while growing up, but hold such completely different political views now.

Donald Trump's motives are something that I can't really figure out.  On the one hand, I can see him as the ultimate grifter, much like Sarah Palin, who enters the race, knowing that he has absolutely no chance of winning the nomination, just so that he can raise money for his "campaign" knowing that he can keep anything he doesn't spend.  You might say, "He's got tons of money.  He doesn't need to do that!"  That may be true, but I've never met a rich person who figured he had enough money, and what better way to get more than to have adoring followers just send it to them?  

On the other hand, he could honestly be one of those who arrogantly feels like everyone else is wrong about the state of the country and only he can fix it.  Not that I think he can actually win, but I worry more about ones like that than the former.  He's got a large following (maybe not as large as he thinks) and stranger things have happened.  Hey, Bush kinda, sorta won.  IF he makes it to the primaries, I doubt he'll be around long after they start.  We shall see.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

http://www.motherjones.com/mixed-media/2015/06/nbc-finally-dumps-donald-trump#123

 

NBC announces that they are cutting all ties to Donald Trump. 

 

Apparently being an insensitive man [edited to comply with posting rules] has consequences in the real world outside his boardroom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL, Steve, you can say Jackass without the dollar signs.  We wont judge.  Unless of course you were making fun of his money as well as his $tupidity, in which ca$e I agree with you.

 

[NOTE: use of the word jackass is acceptable depending on content and context. As a personal attack is it not acceptable.]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I saw this just the other day and thought I would post it here for your thoughts and impressions.

 

This 92 year old woman never voted in her life. Now she has registered to vote in the coming US Presidential Election because there is now a candidate she can be passionate about.

 

http://www.wbko.com/home/headlines/First-time-voter-92-says-shes-for-Trump-313275291.html 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To my Republican friends, I say to you this:  Do NOT panic about Trump being the current leader in the polls.  Remember that at the early stages of the campaign last time around Michelle Bachman was in the lead.  And Governor Perry.  And at one point so was Governor Huckabee.  With a field as big and, let us admit it, loud as the current Republican contenders for nomination is, the early part of the race will be dominated by those who speak loudest, no matter how divisive or extreme their "stated" views are.  And let's also keep in mind that after the nomination, you'll often find the Republican candidate makes a slight shift towards center.  They may be too far right for a center shift to be readily apparent at that point, but that's what plays to the base.

 

In all likelihood, the Republican field will cut itself by half, very soon.  The realities of trying to get a significant piece of the pie are just too far from likely for many of them.  Expect to see campaigns merge, alliances form and the major players start looking for way to snipe at each other by taking careful pot-shots at the Democratic contenders that bounce to other Republicans.  Back handed compliments such as "Well, his policies are definitely not as extreme as HIlary's, but I still think that idea is very Liberal."  It will happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Oh, I agree.  There are large factional issues within the Republican party, which are apparently finally coming home to roost.  While I personally find it interesting to watch the various factions and odd alliances within what used to be a very tightly knit group, it does mean that the chance of getting someone from their political philosophy who is not only more centrist, electable and likely to work well with other nations, seems to be growing smaller.  As much as the Republicans view Democrats as being "less patriotic" or "appeasement minded" or even "anti-christian" it seems like the Democrats are more focused and willing to work together.  And work across the aisles in congress.

 

While my own leanings are far more Democratic, I would like to see a much more common sense approach to who we wind up choosing for our leadership.  Have differences in how you'd do things, sure.  But let's realize that the problems our nation faces are better served by not automatically saying "No, I don't want to do that because you want to do it, and I don't want to have people think I'm like you."

 

317 million people depend on the things our president does on a daily basis.  Perhaps we all need to act like we're at the grown ups table.  No heat on that remark, just a sadness that all sides need to keep in mind what the job they're stumping for really is: a temporary, public service, ceremonial, public relations on an international scale, law enforcement and managerial position.  Emphasis on temporary.

 

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm thinking that it isn't the system that's in place, so much as it is the apathy of the American people of late.  I have a reasonably intelligent nephew, age 24, who does not know the names of any executive officials of the US besides President and VP, and none of the state ones besides governor, nor can he name his congressman or state delegate or Senators or state senator.  He has never called any of them or written to any of them or even emailed any of them.  The voter turnout here is almost never as high as 50%, and when I ask people why they don't vote, I get snide and cynical answers.  Many of them are actually AFRAID of their government(s).  It makes me want to cry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The voter turnout here is almost never as high as 50%, and when I ask people why they don't vote, I get snide and cynical answers.  Many of them are actually AFRAID of their government(s).  It makes me want to cry.

 

V for Vendetta is a great movie.  "People shouldn't be afraid of their government.  Governments should be afraid of their people."  That argument, once made, was what made me flip 180 degrees on the second amendment.

 

Frankly, our government is heading straight for some kind of breakdown, and that statement gets half the reason why.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

 

V for Vendetta is a great movie.  "People shouldn't be afraid of their government.  Governments should be afraid of their people."  That argument, once made, was what made me flip 180 degrees on the second amendment.

People have often referenced this saying to Thomas Jefferson, in which he is reputed as saying:
"When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty."

This comes from Federalist #4. But Jefferson never wrote for the Federalist Papers. That was the work of Alexander Hamilton, John Jay and James Madison, and the quote does not appear there as written.

It is a sentiment that the founders had as it bears on the limited powers of the Federal Government. Regardless of who originally said something like this or when it was said, it remains a sort of truism, that the people should hold in their own hands, the same military power of the State.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a sentiment that the founders had as it bears on the limited powers of the Federal Government. Regardless of who originally said something like this or when it was said, it remains a sort of truism, that the people should hold in their own hands, the same military power of the State.

And I do believe you were the one who convinced me, though you didn't use that exact quote :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not expert in politics let alone the politics of another country but my history teacher make me notice that our own politics is greatly influenced by yours since WW2. example when G.W Bush was elected we elected a president which party had similar view of thing and when he was re-elected our own was too and when you elected Obama we once again elected a president with similar political view (the only time there was a divergence was our last election but only because the president of that time chose to quit politics for a time)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...